Li-Min Chuang¹, Yu-Po Lee², Chien-Chih Kuo^3
1The Department of International Business, Chang Jung Christian University, No. 1, Changda Rd., Gueiren District, Tainan City, 711301, Taiwan
²The Ph.D. Program in Business and Operations Management, College of Management, Chang Jung Christian University, No. 1, Changda Rd., Gueiren District, Tainan City, 711301, Taiwan
³Chien Chang Construction Co., Ltd., No. 88, Wencheng Rd., North Dist., Tainan City, 702029, Taiwan
pp. 187–191
ABSTRACT
The main objective of this study is to probe how Taiwanese building investment and development companies rate the analytical framework and weights of artificial intelligence buildings. Document Analysis, the Delphi method, and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) are applied to conduct a FAHP questionnaire survey among 20 building investment and development companies in Tainan. Based on the calculation of composite weights, the findings are: (1) The most crucial evaluation indicator for security and hazard prevention is the “access control system”. (2) The most crucial evaluation indicator for energy-saving management is “energy-saving technology”. (3) The most crucial evaluation indicator for health and comfort is the “interior comfort system”. (4) The most crucial evaluation indicator for intelligent innovation is the “intelligent innovation concept”.
Keywords: Intelligent building, Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Expert decision evaluation

© 2022 The Author. Published by Sugisaka Masanori at ALife Robotics Corporation Ltd This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license ( h ttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

ARTICLE INFO
Article History
Received 25 November 2021
Accepted 15 July 2022

J-STAGE9213

Download article (PDF)